After I received my undergraduate degree, I came to realize that I had not gotten a very good college education. In addition, I felt that although the college I attended claimed to abide by Quaker morals and ethics, in actuality the Quakerism was merely a cosmetic veneer. As a result, I decided never to give money to the college.
Fast forward to 2024, when Donald Trump chose Howard Lutnick to be Commerce Secretary. I vaguely remembered Howie Lutnick from college. About all I remembered about him was hearing from one of my college friends that Lutnick had become class president, in charge of raising money for the college from his classmates.
Today, the BBC reports that Lutnick had previously lied to Congress by claiming he had cut all ties to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in 2005. Lutnick now admits, in testimony given to Congress today, that he visited Epstein’s infamous island in 2012, accompanied by his wife, his four children, and his nannies. No one is accusing Lutnick of molesting underage girls. But Lutnick not only lied to Congress about his ties to Epstein, he also retained his ties with Epstein even after the latter’s conviction of soliciting prostitution for a child. And knowing that conviction, he brought his own children to Epstein’s island. Yuck.
This was the president of my college class. He does not make me want to give money to my alma mater.
Update, Feb. 19: Apparently, I’m not the only alum disgusted by the fact that Lutnick lied to Congress. A few years back, Lutnick gave a shit-ton of money to the college and they named the library after him. Now other alumni are requesting that his name be taken off the library. A fellow graduate of the college forwarded me a recent email sent out by the president of the college, in which she responds to these requests to rename the library. It is a very mealy-mouthed email. Consider, for example, these two sentences:
“In my prior message, I noted that we are monitoring the situation. This was meant to convey that I am taking this complex issue under deep consideration.”
These two sentences are essentially meaningless. My guess is that she has consulted the college’s lawyers, and they have instructed her to say nothing substantive, and she has complied. Now, supposedly the college is founded upon Quaker principles, and supposedly the entire college is governed by an honor code — but this makes it clear that speaking plainly and speaking the truth and openly talking about ethics mean less to the college administration than avoiding lawsuits and holding on to money. What a horrible lesson they are teaching their students.
No wonder more and more Americans despise elite colleges.

