The Official Diana Wynne Jones Web site reports that the well-known fantasy author died yesterday. She was best known as a “young adult” author, meaning that her books were marketed to early teens, that many of her characters were teenagers, and that her books were actually driven by character and plot rather than literary experimentation. I think of Diana Wynne Jones as an author who was concerned with religion, and not just because of her fantasy series The Dalemark Quartet, which remains my favorite fictional creation story — richer than the thinly-disguised Christian creation story of Narnia, more morally complex than the bombast of Tolkien’s Silmarillion.
Jones herself was confused by the contradictions of ordinary dogmatic Western Christianity. At the age of nine, she had a hard time making sense out of the Anglicanism in which she was raised:
“There I sat [in York Minister cathedral], wrestling with the notion that Heaven Is Within You (not in me, I thought, or I’d know) and of Christ dying for our sins. I stared at the crucifix, thinking how very much being crucified must hurt, and was perturbed that, even with this special treatment, religion was not, somehow, taking on me. (I put it this way to myself because I had baptism and vaccination muddled, like germs and Germans.) “Autobiography” on Official Diana Wynne Jones Web site.
By the age of about ten, she cut through the Gordian knot of mid-20th century Anglicanism in a straightforward way: “I settled my religious muddles by deciding that I had better be an atheist.” Yet for all her atheism, religious and moral questions are integral to her books. At the most superficial level, the Dalemark Quartet is filled with a richly-imagined ancient paganism. Others of her books include organized religion as little more than part of the social landscape, but at a deeper level a sense of awe and wonder at the universe, which is the most basic of religious responses, pervades her books. She also wrestles over and over again with yet another basic religious issue — why is there chaos, and why is there order in the universe?
Many religious liberals rave about the atheist fiction of another young adult author, Phillip Pullman. But Pullman has always struck me as heavy-handed and strident in his atheism. I’d much rather read Diana Wynne Jones. Her fictional universes explore what it’s like to live in a universe where there is no god or goddess who’s going to bail us out if we get in trouble. At the same time, in her universes human beings do not stand at the center of everything; that would make things far too simple. In her universes, there isn’t one correct answer to each moral question; moral choices are difficult and often painful; and in her fictional universes one’s moral choices can make a huge difference to oneself and to others. This is the kind of morality that I would like to present to young adults — or to adults, for that matter.
2 thoughts on “Diana Wynne Jones: an appreciation”
I have to admit, as I slap my own wrist, that I’ve never yet managed to read one of Diana Wynne Jones’s books. (Bad children’s librarian, bad, bad.) But I can say that few kids or teens now read her – the circulation on her books in my town of readers tends to be quite low, and mostly to adults. Which doesn’t say anything about the quality of her books, simply that she isn’t being found by today’s young readers.
And I find your definition of young adult literature interesting: “meaning that her books were marketed to early teens, that many of her characters were teenagers, and that her books were actually driven by character and plot rather than literary experimentation.” I’d agree with you, mostly, and it reminds me of what Julius Lester said to my class at Simmons when we asked him why he switched from writing adult books to children’s and young adult books – he said it was because he liked to write books with plot; that today’s adult books tend to be more about psychology than plot.
I’m in the same position as Abs here. From your description, I wish I had read Wynne Jones growing up! I only became introduced to the fantasy genre when moving to Singapore as a teenager, and even then, most of my friends were reading Pratchett, which I don’t find appealing — the first fantasy author I really appreciated was Gaiman (and the Gaiman-Pratchett double billing, Good Omens, is the only Pratchett I’ve read so far).
I have Pullman’s trilogy, and gave up at the beginning of the second book — as Dan remarked, he does seem too strident and heavy-handed to me. I could see why some devout Catholics are upset by the description of the Magisterium, though even here I’d take the ACLU position and disagree with efforts to ban his books.
What better way for me to preserve Wynne Jones’ legacy than by actually starting to read the books :) Trying to see if they’re available in digital forms anywhere; I try not to preserve my scant shelf space by avoiding physical books these days. Plus it saves the trees…