Churches as over-55 communities

Mr. Crankypants loves Julius Lester. On his blog, he wrote this delightfully snarky post that sounds like it’s about politics, but is really about generational differences. Writing about Hillary Clinton, Lester points out that “her ideas are old.” In of itself this is not an original thought, but Lester goes on to add: “She’s 60, and she sounds like she hasn’t had a new thought in the past 40 years. I say this as someone who is 9 years older than she is, so I know an old idea when I hear it.”

Mr. Crankypants smells a new generation gap. The Baby Boom generation is so doggone big that they wind up spending most of their time talking to one another, not to younger people, and avoiding new ideas. And because they are such a big market, capitalist culture caters to their every whim to the point where they can pretty much insulate themselves from many new ideas in the world. As someone who lives at the tail end of the Baby Boom (being a few months older than Barack Obama), Mr. Crankypants knows this to be true — if he wanted to, he could spend all his time hanging out with people a few years older than himself and talking about the great music of the 1960s and the great literature of the 1960s and the great political movements of the 1960s, etc., none of which have ever been equaled, blah blah blah. (Actually, Mr. C. hates the 1960s, but you get the idea.) Baby Boomers tend to be full of old ideas, even when they think they are full of new ideas.

Not that anyone at this blog is much of a supporter of Barack Obama. It’s tough to get thrilled about a rhetorician who is further to the right than, and probably just as authoritarian as, Richard Nixon; and who doesn’t seem to understand what it means to be a member of a church to boot. But this isn’t a post about politics, this is a post that uses politics as an example of this new generation gap.

For another example of how how this new generation gap seems to work, we need look no further than racism. Julius Lester has this to say about Hillary Clinton: “Even worse, however, is her pandering to white racism has made us a far more racially divided nation than we were before her march to the White House was stopped by Barack Obama. I cannot ever forgive her for that.” But it’s not Hillary Clinton alone who tends to pander to racist tendencies — the Baby Boom generation as a whole tends to do the same thing. It seems to Mr. Crnakypants that many Baby Boomers (of all skin colors) believe that American racism got solved in the 1960s, between the Civil Rights movement (if they’re white) or the Black Power movement (if they’re black). Those old ideas tend to miss the fact that since 1980 racism has mutated and gotten more virulent, and it no longer responds to the old cures. Thus in Unitarian Universalism, Baby Boomers are still using second wave feminist techniques to try to fight racism, without seeing that second wave feminist techniques like consciousness-raising and identity groups were designed for a racism that no longer exists (nor do they see the class bias inherent in those techniques, but that’s another conversation).

And don’t assume this new generation gap (no capitals) is like the old Generation Gap of the 1960s, because they’re utterly different. The younger generations today aren’t bothering with open rebellion, as allegedly happened in the 1960s, they’re just creating new forms and ideas without bothering to talk much to the Baby Boomers.

So how is this new generation gap playing out in liberal churches? The Baby Boomers are in firm control of our local churches and our denomination, now that the GI Generation has started dying off. Baby Boomers are setting up the churches to suit their needs and their worldview, with the result that younger generations are staying away in droves. Our churches are starting to look like those over-55 communities where children and younger adults are allowed to visit but not stay for very long. This is perhaps most obviously manifested in the intensive efforts to create “young adult programming,” which sounds good on paper but in practice functions pretty much like those restrictive covenants in over-55 communities.

Mr. Crankypants is thinking about making stickers that say, “This Church Is An Over-55 Community,” the idea being that you could buy such a sticker and slap it on your church’s sign when no one is looking. Truth in advertising, don’t you know.

6 thoughts on “Churches as over-55 communities

  1. unitalian

    Trouble with the 68ers is they think THEY were the greatest generation, and can’t quite square the circle of ruling the world they once railed against. There’s a contempt for the seeming conformity of the young(er), but perhaps they simply see through the bourgeois hypocrisy of their elders, continually harmping on about the good old days.

    The key issue of the American elections however is not so much racism or misogyny but decline – America’s global influence is plummeting, as highlighted recently in Newsweek, and you need the best person to manage that process. Obama or Clinton would be ok, McCain, as much as I l admire his integrity, is more likely to continue to the illusion. My hunch is this is the way America will go, and for the rest – “all this talking is only bravado”.

  2. Rita

    I think boomers, Gen-X, and Gen-Y need to work together to help the nation move forward. A great grassroots movement is beginning and Obama or Hillary will provide leadership to help citizens with the changes they need. The bickering between needs to stop. Each generations has strengths and weaknesses. We need to work together.

    Rita

  3. jacqueline

    As a Generation X Member I have to say that I enjoy my slacker title. It allows me to surprise the Boomers often with my intellect and passion. They just never see it coming.

    I do know though that they have a stronghold on MOST institutions and are not going to give it up with a fight. They will work/volunteer until they drop dead and by then us Gen X’ers are just not going to be around.

    Working together sounds sweet, but they don’t want us and there aren’t enough of us to get them out. I think we will have to wait for Gen Y… that highly connected generation.

  4. Dan

    jacqueline @ 5 — You write: “Working together sounds sweet, but they don’t want us and there aren’t enough of us to get them out.” That is my general impression, and this is what the so-called Silent Generation (the generation preceding the Boomers) went through — there weren’t as many of them, so power got transferred from the GI Generation directly to the Boomers. The interesting thing about the Silent Generation is that they provided much of the intellectual impetus for the Boomers. So we may not have to wait for Gen Y — we can start doing the intellectual and creative work now, and encourage Gen Y to pick up on it.

Comments are closed.