{"id":9926,"date":"2023-01-19T23:06:17","date_gmt":"2023-01-20T04:06:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/?p=9926"},"modified":"2025-12-14T19:14:35","modified_gmt":"2025-12-15T00:14:35","slug":"noted-without-comment-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/2023\/01\/noted-without-comment-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Noted without comment"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>From Josef Sorett, &#8220;Secular Compared to What?&#8221;, in <em>Race and Secularism in American,<\/em> ed. Johnathan S. Kahn and Vincent W. Lloyd (Columbia Univ. Press, 2016), p. 50:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-dark-red-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-c67b9712f18d55cc47113e80ac46d420\">&#8220;In the United States, Protestantism has been both the privileged religious discourse and the discursive frame privileged in efforts to define both &#8216;religion&#8217; and race,&#8217; alongside a host of other modern categories. Such was the case even as race, framed as secular, modern discourse, was hailed as the principle of social organization that trumped religion \u2014 as an umbrella term for a host of &#8216;primitive practices&#8217; associated with a previous epoch \u2014 under the sign of modernity. In short, to become a modern subject was not simply to become secular or to lose one&#8217;s religion. Rather, it was to acquire &#8216;good religion,&#8217; which meant ascribing to a particular sort of Christianity (read: primarily ethical, literate, and reasoning). Good religion took on the form of white Protestantism. In contrast, black religion was &#8216;bad religion&#8221; in that it carried, by definition, evidence of earlier, African ways of being in the world&#8230;.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From Josef Sorett, &#8220;Secular Compared to What?&#8221;, in Race and Secularism in American, ed. Johnathan S. Kahn and Vincent W. Lloyd (Columbia Univ. Press, 2016), p. 50: &#8220;In the United States, Protestantism has been both the privileged religious discourse and the discursive frame privileged in efforts to define both &#8216;religion&#8217; and race,&#8217; alongside a host &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/2023\/01\/noted-without-comment-4\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Noted without comment&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[427],"tags":[909,836,1191,680,150],"class_list":["post-9926","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy","tag-black-culture","tag-colonialism-and-religion","tag-commonplace-book","tag-defining-religion","tag-race-and-religion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9926","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9926"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9926\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12655,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9926\/revisions\/12655"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}