{"id":9673,"date":"2022-11-12T10:14:41","date_gmt":"2022-11-12T15:14:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/?p=9673"},"modified":"2022-11-12T10:15:02","modified_gmt":"2022-11-12T15:15:02","slug":"finding-common-ground","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/2022\/11\/finding-common-ground\/","title":{"rendered":"Finding common ground"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In the May, 2022, issue of &#8220;St. Anthony Messenger,&#8221; a publication of Franciscan Media (Roman Catholic), there was an article by Mark P. Shea titled &#8220;I&#8217;d Like To Say: Stop Weaponizing the Eucharist.&#8221; For those of us who take a pro-choice position, this article contains some observations that we could perhaps agree with. Like this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Our [U.S.] abortion policy is, in fact, a triumph of libertarian thinking and the free market. Women can abort or not as they wish&#8230;. What drive abortion is not the state but economic pressure. Abortion is primarily pursued as an economic relief valve by women who feel they cannot afford to raise a child. The number one abortifacient in the United States, according to the Guttmacher Institute, is poverty.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Those of us in the pro-choice camp who are uncomfortable with libertarianism can find a lot to agree with in this statement. Obviously, we want to include other, less common, reasons for abortion (rape, non-viable foetus, extreme birth defects, etc.). But if we want to work towards finding common ground in a polarized political landscape, this would be a good starting point &#8212; provide adequate economic support for all pregnant women, and adequate economic support for all families with babies and children and teenagers. The libertarian, free-market approach to raising children is not working.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To prove his point, Shea goes on to note:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;There came a precipitous drop in abortion rates in the 1990s. The reason had nothing to do with the [U.S. Supreme] Court. It was due to Clinton-era policies that took economic pressure to abort off lower-income women. Far from &#8216;promoting&#8217; abortion, the goal during the Clinon years was, in the words of the administration, to make abortion &#8216;safe, legal, and <em>rare<\/em>.&#8217; And the numbers show that Clinton&#8217;s policies, in fact, achieved the pro-life goal of reducing abortion.&#8217;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I am no fan of Bill Clinton, or his administration. But I agree with Shea that this Clinton-era policy was a good one. This could serve as a common policy goal that could be supported by pro-life and pro-choice advocates together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Unfortunately, now that Roe has been struck down, I think there may be less incentive for pro-life advocates to work together with us to develop public policies that support families with children. Nevertheless, I feel this is an area where we should be working hard to find common ground in our polarized country. I hope we can make the case that libertarian, free-market policies are not good for children, regardless of the legal status of abortion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the May, 2022, issue of &#8220;St. Anthony Messenger,&#8221; a publication of Franciscan Media (Roman Catholic), there was an article by Mark P. Shea titled &#8220;I&#8217;d Like To Say: Stop Weaponizing the Eucharist.&#8221; For those of us who take a pro-choice position, this article contains some observations that we could perhaps agree with. Like this: &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/2022\/11\/finding-common-ground\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Finding common ground&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[710,21],"tags":[795],"class_list":["post-9673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ethics","category-political-culture","tag-abortion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9673"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9673\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9674,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9673\/revisions\/9674"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}