{"id":7309,"date":"2018-10-07T22:12:55","date_gmt":"2018-10-08T05:12:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/?p=7309"},"modified":"2018-10-07T22:14:07","modified_gmt":"2018-10-08T05:14:07","slug":"the-perilous-whiteness-of-pumpkins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/2018\/10\/the-perilous-whiteness-of-pumpkins\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;The perilous whiteness of pumpkins&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Overwork and health issues have kept me away from this blog for a couple of weeks, but I now bring you an important scholarly article just in time for Halloween.<\/p>\n<p>Back in 2015, two scholars published a peer-reviewed article in the academic journal GeoHumanities titled <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/2373566X.2015.1099421?src=recsys&#038;\">&#8220;The Perilous Whiteness of Pumpkins.&#8221;<\/a> From the abstract: &#8220;Pumpkins in popular culture also reveal contemporary racial and class coding of rural versus urban places.&#8221; In other words, according to the authors, rural working class white folks dig pumpkins; urban middle class non-white folks, not so much; furthermore, this difference can lead to riots.<\/p>\n<p>This could have been an interesting article, except I got lost in jargon-filled prose like this: &#8220;Spaces where actual pumpkins reside differ from spaces in which metaphorical pumpkins are segregated in the social landscape of modern U.S. cultures.&#8221; I&#8217;m honestly not sure just what that means, although maybe I just don&#8217;t get the jargon of the interdisciplinary study of geography and humanities.<\/p>\n<p>But this next sentence I am quite sure I understand: &#8220;Actual pumpkins and the ideas of pumpkins intersect; both stay on the page for the remainder of this article.&#8221; I saw no actual pumpkins staying on the page for the remainder of the article. Or I suppose if I had seen the intersection of actual pumpkins, and ideas of pumpkins, it would have looked like this:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/BlogOct0718-1024x814.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"840\" height=\"668\" class=\"alignleft size-large wp-image-7310\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/BlogOct0718.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/BlogOct0718-300x238.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/BlogOct0718-768x611.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 1362px) 62vw, 840px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>By the way, you will notice that this Venn diagram stayed on the page for the remainder of the time you were looking at this article. I have come to expect that sort of behavior from Venn diagrams, although to paraphrase Lord Berkeley&#8217;s question: If a Venn diagram is on the page, and no one sees it, does it stay on the page for the remainder of the article? The only reason I can indulge in such stupid sophomoric humor is that the authors of this article needed a remedial course in writing good prose.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Overwork and health issues have kept me away from this blog for a couple of weeks, but I now bring you an important scholarly article just in time for Halloween. Back in 2015, two scholars published a peer-reviewed article in the academic journal GeoHumanities titled &#8220;The Perilous Whiteness of Pumpkins.&#8221; From the abstract: &#8220;Pumpkins in &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/2018\/10\/the-perilous-whiteness-of-pumpkins\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;&#8220;The perilous whiteness of pumpkins&#8221;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pop-culture"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7309"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7312,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7309\/revisions\/7312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/yauu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}