{"id":736,"date":"2007-01-04T22:41:05","date_gmt":"2007-01-05T03:41:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/?p=736"},"modified":"2008-02-10T18:45:01","modified_gmt":"2008-02-10T23:45:01","slug":"736","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/?p=736","title":{"rendered":"Overview"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Our congregation&#8217;s CUUPS (Covenant of Unitarian Universalist Pagans) chapter asked me to meet with them this evening and talk with them about Unitarian Universalism. Which forced me to a quick overview of the current state of Unitarian Universalism. Here&#8217;s my short list of what we stand for these days:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>We&#8217;re non-creedal. We explicitly state that we don&#8217;t tell you what to believe.<\/li>\n<li>But we have boundaries, too. One of our boundaries: you shouldn&#8217;t come into a Unitarian Universalist congregation and tell other people what to believe.<\/li>\n<li>We&#8217;re pro-science. For example, we do not find evolutionary biology to be threatening to our religion.<\/li>\n<li>We&#8217;re disorganized. Like the rest of the religious liberals (or spiritual progressives, if you like that name better), we can&#8217;t seem to get our act together organizationally speaking.<\/li>\n<li>We&#8217;re &#8220;post-Christian.&#8221; To my friend the rabbi we look like Christians, but more conservative Christians are quite sure that we are not Christians. So I&#8217;d say we&#8217;re post-Christian and proud of it.<\/li>\n<li>We&#8217;re relatively open. No human community is perfect, and we have our moments of intolerance, but as religious organizations go we&#8217;re pretty open.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>As one example of a definition of Unitarian Universalism, I passed out printed copies of Time Berners-Lee&#8217;s online essay <a href=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/People\/Berners-Lee\/UU.html\">WWW, UU, and I<\/a> &#8212; which I still think is one of the best expositions of what it means to be a Unitarian Unviersalist in our time.<\/p>\n<p>Then I talked a little bit about where Unitarian Universalism seems to be heading. Acknowledging that we&#8217;re too anarchic to really agree on a direction in which to head, here&#8217;s my short list of preferred destinations:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>We should be moving towards a new way of organizing. The organizational structure of most Unitarian Universalist congregations keeps us at 50 to 100 members. We should adopt a scalable organizational architecture. I like the idea of small groups linked in larger web formations (see Starhawk&#8217;s <em>Dreaming the Dark: Magic, Sex, and Politics<\/em> for a good discussion of this, or the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smallgroupministry.net\/\">Small Group Ministry Network<\/a> for another approach).<\/li>\n<li>We should be interpreting the Western religious traditions (Western Christian, Jewish, and European pagan traditions) to support the healing of Nature and the earth.<\/li>\n<li>We should be working on building dialogue between secular non-religious folk and religious liberals, helping both groups to find common causes on which they can work together.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Towards the end, we also talked about how various religious liberal groups &#8212; pagans, Unitarian Universalists, liberal Christians, liberal Jews &#8212; could work together on the same sex marriage issue. We all pretty much agreed that this is the big issue facing religious liberals in Massachusetts today. (So I told the CUUPS group about the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rcfm.org\/\">Religious Coalition for the Freedom to Marry<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.massequality.org\/\">Mass Equality<\/a> &#8212; send them money, and sign up to receive email updates from them!)<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s my quick overview of Unitarian Universalism. Your results may vary. No guarantees that I will agree with myself tomorrow.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Our congregation&#8217;s CUUPS (Covenant of Unitarian Universalist Pagans) chapter asked me to meet with them this evening and talk with them about Unitarian Universalism. Which forced me to a quick overview of the current state of Unitarian Universalism. Here&#8217;s my short list of what we stand for these days: We&#8217;re non-creedal. We explicitly state that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[342],"class_list":["post-736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberal-religion","tag-tim-berners-lee"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=736"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}