{"id":703,"date":"2006-11-28T18:25:06","date_gmt":"2006-11-28T23:25:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/?p=703"},"modified":"2010-07-31T20:14:51","modified_gmt":"2010-08-01T03:14:51","slug":"anti-science-grr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/?p=703","title":{"rendered":"Anti-science, grr&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the key aspects of Mr. Crankypants&#8217;s religion is that <em>his<\/em> religion is compatible with science. Call him pro-science <em>and<\/em> pro-religious &#8212; in fact, Mr. Crankypants would be proud if you called him pro-science.<\/p>\n<p>Politics is not usually a topic for this blog, but there is little doubt that the current administration in Washington is anti-science. Mr. Crankypants likes to read &#8220;Bad Astronomy,&#8221; a blog written by an astronomer named Phil Plait who writes periodically about what he has come to call <a href=\"http:\/\/www.badastronomy.com\/bablog\/2006\/11\/01\/white-house-tampering-of-science-part\/\">White House tampering of science<\/a>. For example, Mr. Plait has written on White House attempts to legislate against evolution, and about how the White House distorts the science around global warming. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.badastronomy.com\/bablog\/2006\/11\/27\/chilly-climate-part-i\/\">Recently<\/a> Plait wrote about how the White House has managed to slash NASA&#8217;s budget, despite what Congress had budgeted for NASA. Why slash NASA&#8217;s budget? &#8211;follow the link to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.columbia.edu\/~jeh1\/worldwatch_nov2006.pdf\">article by James Hansen<\/a>, director of NASA&#8217;s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and you&#8217;ll discover that the White House doesn&#8217;t like the fact that some of NASA&#8217;s research has been providing additional confirmation to the fact of global warming. <\/p>\n<p>Hansen&#8217;s article includes a great quote by Richard Feynman:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The only way to have real success in science&#8230; is to describe the evidence very carefully without regard to the way you feel it should be.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Mr. Crankypants can&#8217;t help thinking that at least part of the reason the current inhabitants of the White House are anti-science is due to their self-professed religious viewpoint, that of Christian literalism &#8212; a religious viewpoint that dismisses solid science like evolution, atmospheric science,  psychology,* and the Big Bang &#8212; because the evidence conflicts with the way the White House feels the world should be.<\/p>\n<p>Religion need not be anti-science. Mr. Crankypants&#8217;s religion is compatible with science. What about yours?<\/p>\n<p><em>* Psychology is on the short list, because psychologists have long since determined that homosexuality is not a form of mental illness, i.e., it is not aberrant behavior &#8212; a determination which conflicts with the way the White House feels about the world.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the key aspects of Mr. Crankypants&#8217;s religion is that his religion is compatible with science. Call him pro-science and pro-religious &#8212; in fact, Mr. Crankypants would be proud if you called him pro-science. Politics is not usually a topic for this blog, but there is little doubt that the current administration in Washington [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47],"tags":[280],"class_list":["post-703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pop-culture","tag-global-climate-change"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=703"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/703\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7431,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/703\/revisions\/7431"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}