{"id":416,"date":"2006-03-23T20:04:12","date_gmt":"2006-03-24T01:04:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/?p=416"},"modified":"2008-01-25T12:28:51","modified_gmt":"2008-01-25T17:28:51","slug":"religion-vs-spirituality-revisited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/?p=416","title":{"rendered":"Religion vs. spirituality revisited"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m working on this week&#8217;s sermon, which will focus on &#8220;new religious movements.&#8221; As I did some reading to prepare, I found an interesting passage in the book <em>New Religions: A Guide: New Religious Movements, Sects, and Alternative Spiritualities,<\/em> edited by Christopher Partridge (Oxford University Press, 2004), that has helped me to clarify the difference between religion and spirituality.<\/p>\n<p>In his introductory essay, Partridge takes some time to distinguish between religious movements, sects, and alternative spiritualities &#8212; and I found his definition of the latter to be particularly helpful:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The term &#8216;alternative spirituality&#8217; has been included because not all the articles in this volume discuss beliefs and practices that can be described as &#8216;religious&#8217;. Arguably, one of the more significant developments in particularly Western religious adherence is the emergence of private, non-institutional forms of belief and practice. The sacred persists, but increasingly it does so in non-traditional forms. There is, as the sociologist Grace Davie has argued, &#8216;believing without belonging&#8217;. More specifically, it can be argued that much of this believing without belonging should be defined as &#8216;spirituality&#8217; rather than &#8216;religion&#8217;. There is in the West, for example, a move away from traditional forms of belief, which have developed within religious institutions, towards forms of belief that focus on the self, on nature, or simply on &#8216;life&#8217;. While there may be particular traditional teachings that are valued by the individual seeker, or particular groups to which the individual belongs, generally speaking there is a suspicion of traditional authorities, sacred texts, churches, and hierarchies of power. There is a move away from a &#8216;religion&#8217; that focuses on things that are considered external to the self (God, the Bible, the church [and maybe Truth and Goodness?]) to &#8216;spirituality&#8217; &#8212; that which focuses on &#8216;the self&#8217; and is personal and interior&#8230;.[pp. 16-17]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Reading this, it struck me that &#8216;believing without belonging&#8217; is one of the major challenges faced by any institutionalized religious movement today. It also fits in with my observations:&#8211; many newcomers to the congregation I serve have little idea of how institutionalized religion works; they are sometimes suspicious of institutionalized religion; and they are often wary of committing themselves to a religious institution.<\/p>\n<p>Christopher Partridge continues his definition of &#8220;alternative spiritualities&#8221; by saying this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>While the term &#8216;spirituality&#8217; in this volume often has a particular reference to the &#8216;turn to the self&#8217;, it is also used of religious reflection that, strictly speaking, refers to more than this. For example, much contemporary feminist and eco-feminist spirituality cannot be considered as principally a &#8216;turn to the self&#8217; and, indeed, is often developed within a particular religious tradition. Hence, when the term &#8216;spirituality&#8217; is used of such developments it is used in a broader, less precise way, which merges with what might be understood as a &#8216;soft definition&#8217; of religion. &#8230;[Some] Christian spiritualities discussed in this volume seek to overturn the distinction between the spiritual and the non-spiritual and understand spirituality to be a quest for full humanity that embraces the whole of the created order. Perhaps spirituality can be understood as a path that, while focusing on the self, seeks to extend to all life and certainly beyond the bounds of institutional religion. [p. 17]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>While I&#8217;ve always felt a little queasy about &#8220;spirituality&#8221; as the term is usually used, I could definitely be an advocate of spirituality as a quest for a full humanity that gets individuals to embrace all humanity, all living beings, indeed all of life. At the same time, I&#8217;m all too aware of the pressures of mass culture that don&#8217;t allow us time or place to engage in spirituality &#8212; and that time\/place is exactly what institutionalized religion (especially a local congregation) can provide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m working on this week&#8217;s sermon, which will focus on &#8220;new religious movements.&#8221; As I did some reading to prepare, I found an interesting passage in the book New Religions: A Guide: New Religious Movements, Sects, and Alternative Spiritualities, edited by Christopher Partridge (Oxford University Press, 2004), that has helped me to clarify the difference [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[176,75],"class_list":["post-416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberal-religion","tag-christopher-partridge","tag-new-religious-movements"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}