{"id":1169,"date":"2008-01-30T23:51:42","date_gmt":"2008-01-31T04:51:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/?p=1169"},"modified":"2008-01-30T23:51:42","modified_gmt":"2008-01-31T04:51:42","slug":"a-little-more-nuance-with-that-please","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/?p=1169","title":{"rendered":"A little more nuance with that, please"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The January, 2008, issue of <em>Locus<\/em> celebrates the 90th birthday of Arthur C. Clarke with a number of special features, including a December interview borrowed from BBC&#8217;s <em>Focus<\/em> magazine. The interviewer asks, &#8220;What is the greatest threat that we, as a race, are facing?&#8221; and Sir Arthur replies:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Organised religion polluting our minds as it pretends to deliver morality and spiritual salvation. It&#8217;s spreading the most malevolent mind virus of all. I hope our race can one day outgrow this primitive notion, as I envisaged in <em>3001: The Final Odyssey<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think Clarke underestimates the threat of global climate change, nuclear weapons, and continuing population growth, but as he admits elsewhere in the interview, &#8220;I have great faith in optimism as a philosophy, if only because it offers us the opportunity of self-fulfilling prophesy.&#8221; There are a few other threats I&#8217;d throw in there before I got to religion &#8212; global poverty and associated malnutrition, the growing crisis around clean water supplies, violence against women, etc., etc. &#8212; threats that can physically kill you long before religion&#8217;s &#8220;mind virus&#8221; infects you.<\/p>\n<p>Having said that, organized religion that &#8220;pretends to deliver morality and spiritual salvation&#8221; is indeed a dangerous thing; George W. Bush&#8217;s religion, which appears to have driven him to an ill-considered war in Iraq, is a case in point. Like Clarke, I am wary of religion that claims to deliver morality;&#8211; although I&#8217;m quite comfortable with a religion that allows consideration of moral issues in a skeptical but supportive community because it seems to me that moral issues are impossible to resolve on one&#8217;s own, and today&#8217;s market-driven society here in the United States allows precious few places where groups of people can talk through moral issues openly. Like Clarke, I am also wary of any religion that pretends to deliver spiritual salvation;&#8211; although I&#8217;m comfortable with a religion that simply states that all persons are automatically saved as a way of making the point that all persons are worthy of dignity and respect; but aside from that, I have no interest in a religion that claims to provide salvation only to a chosen few. (And yeah, I admit my bias, I like to think that <em>my<\/em> religion is one with which I can be comfortable.)<\/p>\n<p>So I think Clarke makes one or both of the usual two errors that people make damning judgement of religion. The first error lies in damning all religion based on a small set of direct experiences with organized religion; and the second error lies in damning all religion based on portrayals of religion in the media. The first error uses too small a sample for adequate statistical analysis, and ignores exceptions that really must be considered before making such broad pronouncements. The second error is the classic error of relying on second-hand sources of questionable accuracy; if adequate first-hand observation isn&#8217;t possible, it&#8217;s always better to rely on serious peer-reviewed scholarly works, to get better data and a more nuanced analysis of that data.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The January, 2008, issue of Locus celebrates the 90th birthday of Arthur C. Clarke with a number of special features, including a December interview borrowed from BBC&#8217;s Focus magazine. The interviewer asks, &#8220;What is the greatest threat that we, as a race, are facing?&#8221; and Sir Arthur replies: Organised religion polluting our minds as it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47],"tags":[270],"class_list":["post-1169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pop-culture","tag-sf-f"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1169\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.danielharper.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}